Template

AI code review policy template

A policy should say what an automated review can do, who owns verification, which changes need extra scrutiny, and how exceptions are documented.

Get started How it works

Juror · Last reviewed: 2026-08-22

Direct answer

A policy should say what an automated review can do, who owns verification, which changes need extra scrutiny, and how exceptions are documented.

01Risk levels

02Human ownership

03Exceptions

How it works

Start from a pinned, least-privilege workflow.

The action reference uses a released commit SHA. Store provider keys in GitHub secrets and inspect the first review before you require it.

name: Juror review
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]

permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  review:
    if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.fork == false
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: Juror-AI/juror@3eb0c88ce1931dd6227d554b2d9707ee4bca123f
        with:
          github-token: ${{ github.token }}
          preset: balanced
          cost-target-usd: "4.00"

How it works

A policy should say what an automated review can do, who owns verification, which changes need extra scrutiny, and how exceptions are documented.

For ai code review policy template, use the published configuration and source repository as the product record. Keep the workflow small enough to inspect, and record any exception in the pull request rather than assuming a model result is final.

Limits to keep in view

Models, providers, and benchmark conditions change. Juror does not replace code ownership, test suites, static analysis, or a human decision to merge. Treat unknown cost and unevaluated compatibility as explicit unknowns.

Next task

Template

AI code review policy template

Direct answer

Start from a pinned, least-privilege workflow.

How it works

Limits to keep in view

Next task

Code review templates

Juror GitHub Actions workflow template

Pull request template for reliable review