Independent reviewers
Run independently configured reviewers against the same sealed checkout.
MULTI-MODEL CODE REVIEW
Juror gives pull requests independent review perspectives without turning the result into repeated comments or an opaque bill.
GitHub Action · Read-only reviewers · Deduplicated findings · Cost receipt
Three observations merged into one anchored finding.
THE REVIEW BOTTLENECK
Juror treats a model review as evidence to inspect, not a final answer. Independent harnesses examine an isolated checkout, then the merge layer anchors, clusters, and verifies their observations before one clear GitHub review is published.
THE PRODUCT FLOW
WHAT CHANGES
Run independently configured reviewers against the same sealed checkout.
Preserve supporting evidence while returning one anchored issue to the author.
Keep reported, estimated, partial, and unknown cost coverage visible.
FINDING LIFECYCLE
COST RECEIPT
Cost is labeled as reported, estimated, partial, or unknown. A missing value is never treated as zero.
| Harness | Input | Cached | Output | Cost status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | 42.1k | 18.5k | 3.1k | Reported |
| Claude | 39.8k | — | 2.4k | Reported |
| Verifier | 8.2k | — | 0.7k | Estimated |
START SMALL
Begin with a dry run, inspect the result, and keep provider credentials in GitHub secrets.
name: Juror review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
jobs:
review:
if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.fork == false
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: Juror-AI/juror@3eb0c88ce1931dd6227d554b2d9707ee4bca123f
with:
github-token: ${{ github.token }}
preset: balanced
cost-target-usd: "4.00"READY FOR THE NEXT PULL REQUEST?