Juror
Language
View on GitHubGet started
Juror/Template

Template

Pull request template for reliable review

Choose the smallest template that captures context, verification, and rollout. A template should help reviewers ask better questions, not create filler.

Get startedHow it works

Juror · Last reviewed: 2026-08-22

Direct answer

Choose the smallest template that captures context, verification, and rollout. A template should help reviewers ask better questions, not create filler.

01Small change
02Feature change
03Hotfix

How it works

Start from a pinned, least-privilege workflow.

The action reference uses a released commit SHA. Store provider keys in GitHub secrets and inspect the first review before you require it.

name: Juror review
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]

permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  review:
    if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.fork == false
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: Juror-AI/juror@3eb0c88ce1931dd6227d554b2d9707ee4bca123f
        with:
          github-token: ${{ github.token }}
          preset: balanced
          cost-target-usd: "4.00"

How it works

Choose the smallest template that captures context, verification, and rollout. A template should help reviewers ask better questions, not create filler.

For pull request template for reliable review, use the published configuration and source repository as the product record. Keep the workflow small enough to inspect, and record any exception in the pull request rather than assuming a model result is final.

Limits to keep in view

Models, providers, and benchmark conditions change. Juror does not replace code ownership, test suites, static analysis, or a human decision to merge. Treat unknown cost and unevaluated compatibility as explicit unknowns.

Continue reading

Next task

Template

Code review templates

→Template

Juror GitHub Actions workflow template

→Template

Code review checklist template

→