How it works
Fast review is not shallow review. Teams improve throughput by giving reviewers context, separating severity from style, and recording decisions.
For code review best practices for fast teams, use the published configuration and source repository as the product record. Keep the workflow small enough to inspect, and record any exception in the pull request rather than assuming a model result is final.
Limits to keep in view
Models, providers, and benchmark conditions change. Juror does not replace code ownership, test suites, static analysis, or a human decision to merge. Treat unknown cost and unevaluated compatibility as explicit unknowns.